1. Please write a short response (200 -300 words) to the reading called “Why are young people pretending to love work”.2. A comment or response you post to another posting (see below):”I think this article touches a lot on the idea that we are who we learn to be. Before such extreme work became normal, doing so probably seemed like a way to stand out to young people just entering the workforce. Someone who can offer a company that sort of work ethic might have stood out amongst a sea of applicants who were expecting a normal 40 hours per week. As more people caught on to this trick, slowly but surely some of the bigger companies would have started to expect this quality from people those they hired instead of just seeing it as a perk. Observerving hopefuls would see this and realize that, in order to be hired somewhere, they would also have to adopt this work ethic to even match up with their competition. Then, once in the workplace, all of these employees keep up this race to continually try to get promoted and move on to bigger and brighter things. Once the mega work ethic became popular, it also became seemingly necessary for success.” This article is a bit extreme in its total condemnation of the extreme work ethic. While it is true that some people lead this sort of life in misery, many actually do love their jobs. Some actually do devote a majority of the hours they are alive to what they do because they genuinely want to and enjoy doing so. On the other hand, I agree completely with the author’s concerns about this sort of lifestyle limiting people’s exploration of extracurriculars. I am of the belief that having a variety of activities and passions can make you happier in addition to making you a better resource in your work life. A diverse lifestyle is a creative lifestyle, and such a strenuous work schedule devoted to one job jeopardizes that. 3. A comment on an incident, topic, issue on campus or in the real world which you find sociologically interesting and to which you can apply sociological ideas (see below):How did the school handle Angie’s situation? How did she feel with the lack of support there was? How did her experience at the psychiatric ward shape how she saw herself, the school, and what she went through? Share your thoughts on her piece.
why_are_young_people_pretending_to_love_work._nyt_1_26_19_1.docx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Why Are Young People Pretending to Love
Work?
I saw the greatest minds of my generation log 18-hour days — and then boast about #hustle on
Instagram. When did performative workaholism become a lifestyle?
CreditTaylor Callery
Image
CreditCreditTaylor Callery
By Erin Griffith
•
Jan. 26, 2019
Never once at the start of my workweek — not in my morning coffee shop line; not in my
crowded subway commute; not as I begin my bottomless inbox slog — have I paused, looked to
the heavens and whispered: #ThankGodIt’sMonday.
Apparently, that makes me a traitor to my generation. I learned this during a series of recent
visits to WeWork locations in New York, where the throw pillows implore busy tenants to “Do
what you love.” Neon signs demand they “Hustle harder,” and murals spread the gospel of
T.G.I.M. Even the cucumbers in WeWork’s water coolers have an agenda. “Don’t stop when
you’re tired,” someone recently carved into the floating vegetables’ flesh. “Stop when you are
done.” Kool-Aid drinking metaphors are rarely this literal.
Welcome to hustle culture. It is obsessed with striving, relentlessly positive, devoid of humor,
and — once you notice it — impossible to escape. “Rise and Grind” is both the theme of a Nike
ad campaign and the title of a book by a “Shark Tank” shark. New media upstarts like the Hustle,
which produces a popular business newsletter and conference series, and One37pm, a content
company created by the patron saint of hustling, Gary Vaynerchuk, glorify ambition not as a
means to an end, but as a lifestyle.
“The current state of entrepreneurship is bigger than career,” reads the One37pm “About Us”
page. “It’s ambition, grit and hustle. It’s a live performance that lights up your creativity … a
sweat session that sends your endorphins coursing … a visionary who expands your way of
thinking.” From this point of view, not only does one never stop hustling — one never exits a
kind of work rapture, in which the chief purpose of exercising or attending a concert is to get
inspiration that leads back to the desk.
Ryan Harwood, the chief executive of One37pm’s parent company, told me that the site’s
content is aimed at a younger generation of people who are seeking permission to follow their
dreams. “They want to know how to own their moment, at any given moment,” he said.
“Owning one’s moment” is a clever way to rebrand “surviving the rat race.” In the new work
culture, enduring or even merely liking one’s job is not enough. Workers should love what they
do, and then promote that love on social media, thus fusing their identities to that of their
employers. Why else would LinkedIn build its own version of Snapchat Stories?
This is toil glamour, and it is going mainstream. Most visibly, WeWork — which investors
recently valued at $47 billion — is on its way to becoming the Starbucks of office culture. It has
exported its brand of performative workaholism to 27 countries, with 400,000 tenants, including
workers from 30 percent of the Global Fortune 500.
In January, WeWork’s founder, Adam Neumann, announced that his start-up was rebranding
itself as the We Company, to reflect an expansion into residential real estate and education.
Describing the shift, Fast Company wrote: “Rather than just renting desks, the company aims to
encompass all aspects of people’s lives, in both physical and digital worlds.” The ideal client,
one imagines, is someone so enamored of the WeWork office aesthetic — whip-cracking
cucumbers and all — that she sleeps in a WeLive apartment, works out at a Rise by We gym,
and sends her children to a WeGrow school.
From this vantage, “Office Space,” the Gen-X slacker paean that came out 20 years ago next
month, feels like science fiction from a distant realm. It’s almost impossible to imagine a start-up
worker bee of today confessing, as protagonist Peter Gibbons does, “It’s not that I’m lazy. It’s
that I just don’t care.” Workplace indifference just doesn’t have a socially acceptable hashtag.
‘It’s grim and exploitative’
It’s not difficult to view hustle culture as a swindle. After all, convincing a generation of workers
to beaver away is convenient for those at the top.
“The vast majority of people beating the drums of hustle-mania are not the people doing the
actual work. They’re the managers, financiers and owners,” said David Heinemeier Hansson, the
co-founder of Basecamp, a software company. We spoke in October, as he was promoting his
new book, “It Doesn’t Have to Be Crazy at Work,” about creating healthy company cultures.
Mr. Heinemeier Hansson said that despite data showing long hours improve neither productivity
nor creativity, myths about overwork persist because they justify the extreme wealth created for
a small group of elite techies. “It’s grim and exploitative,” he said.
Elon Musk, who stands to reap stock compensation upward of $50 billion if his company, Tesla,
meets certain performance levels, is a prime example of extolling work by the many that will
primarily benefit him. He tweeted in November that there are easier places to work than Tesla,
“but nobody ever changed the world on 40 hours a week.” The correct number of hours “varies
per person,” he continued, but is “about 80 sustained, peaking about 100 at times. Pain level
increases exponentially above 80.”
Mr. Musk, who has more than 24 million Twitter followers, further noted that if you love what
you do, “it (mostly) doesn’t feel like work.” Even he had to soften the lie of T.G.I.M. with a
parenthetical.
Arguably, the technology industry started this culture of work zeal sometime around the turn of
the millennium, when the likes of Google started to feed, massage and even play doctor to its
employees. The perks were meant to help companies attract the best talent — and keep
employees at their desks longer. It seemed enviable enough: Who wouldn’t want an employer
that literally took care of your dirty laundry?
But today, as tech culture infiltrates every corner of the business world, its hymns to the virtues
of relentless work remind me of nothing so much as Soviet-era propaganda, which promoted
impossible-seeming feats of worker productivity to motivate the labor force. One obvious
difference, of course, is that those Stakhanovite posters had an anticapitalist bent, criticizing the
fat cats profiting from free enterprise. Today’s messages glorify personal profit, even if bosses
and investors — not workers — are the ones capturing most of the gains. Wage growth has been
essentially stagnant for years.
Perhaps we’ve all gotten a little hungry for meaning. Participation in organized religion is
falling, especially among American millennials. In San Francisco, where I live, I’ve noticed that
the concept of productivity has taken on an almost spiritual dimension. Techies here have
internalized the idea — rooted in the Protestant work ethic — that work is not something you do
to get what you want; the work itself is all. Therefore any life hack or company perk that
optimizes their day, allowing them to fit in even more work, is not just desirable but inherently
good.
Aidan Harper, who created a European workweek-shrinkage campaign called 4 Day Week,
argues that this is dehumanizing and toxic. “It creates the assumption that the only value we have
as human beings is our productivity capability — our ability to work, rather than our humanity,”
he told me.
It’s cultist, Mr. Harper added, to convince workers to buy into their own exploitation with a
change-the-world message. “It’s creating the idea that Elon Musk is your high priest,” he said.
“You’re going into your church every day and worshiping at the altar of work.”
For congregants of the Cathedral of Perpetual Hustle, spending time on anything that’s nonwork
related has become a reason to feel guilty. Jonathan Crawford, a San Francisco-based
entrepreneur, told me that he sacrificed his relationships and gained more than 40 pounds while
working on Storenvy, his e-commerce start-up. If he socialized, it was at a networking event. If
he read, it was a business book. He rarely did anything that didn’t have a “direct R.O.I.,” or
return on investment, for his company.
Mr. Crawford changed his lifestyle after he realized it made him miserable. Now, as an
entrepreneur-in-residence at 500 Start-ups, an investment firm, he tells fellow founders to seek
out nonwork-related activities like reading fiction, watching movies or playing games. Somehow
this comes off as radical advice. “It’s oddly eye-opening to them because they didn’t realize they
saw themselves as a resource to be expended,” Mr. Crawford said.
It’s easy to become addicted to the pace and stress of work in 2019. Bernie Klinder, a consultant
for a large tech company, said he tried to limit himself to five 11-hour days per week, which adds
up to an extra day of productivity. “If your peers are competitive, working a ‘normal workweek’
will make you look like a slacker,” he wrote in an email.
Still, he’s realistic about his place in the rat race. “I try to keep in mind that if I dropped dead
tomorrow, all of my acrylic workplace awards would be in the trash the next day,” he wrote,
“and my job would be posted in the paper before my obituary.”
Lusty for Monday mornings
The logical endpoint of excessively avid work, of course, is burnout. That is the subject of a
recent viral essay by the BuzzFeed cultural critic Anne Helen Petersen, which thoughtfully
addresses one of the incongruities of hustle-mania in the young. Namely: If Millennials are
supposedly lazy and entitled, how can they also be obsessed with killing it at their jobs?
Millennials, Ms. Petersen argues, are just desperately striving to meet their own high
expectations. An entire generation was raised to expect that good grades and extracurricular
overachievement would reward them with fulfilling jobs that feed their passions. Instead, they
wound up with precarious, meaningless work and a mountain of student loan debt. And so
posing as a rise-and-grinder, lusty for Monday mornings, starts to make sense as a defense
mechanism.
Most jobs — even most good jobs! — are full of pointless drudgery. Most corporations let us
down in some way. And yet years after the HBO satire “Silicon Valley” made the vacuous
mission statement “making the world a better place” a recurring punch line, many companies
still cheerlead the virtues of work with high-minded messaging. For example, Spotify, a
company that lets you listen to music, says that its mission is “to unlock the potential of human
creativity.” Dropbox, which lets you upload files and stuff, says its purpose is “to unleash the
world’s creative energy by designing a more enlightened way of working.”
David Spencer, a professor of economics at Leeds University Business School, says that such
posturing by companies, economists and politicians dates at least to the rise of mercantilism in
16th-century Europe. “There has been an ongoing struggle by employers to venerate work in
ways that distract from its unappealing features,” he said. But such propaganda can backfire. In
17th-century England, work was lauded as a cure for vice, Mr. Spencer said, but the unrewarding
truth just drove workers to drink more.
Internet companies may have miscalculated in encouraging employees to equate their work with
their intrinsic value as human beings. After a long era of basking in positive esteem, the tech
industry is experiencing a backlash both broad and fierce, on subjects from monopolistic
behavior to spreading disinformation and inciting racial violence. And workers are discovering
how much power they wield. In November, some 20,000 Googlers participated in a walkout
protesting the company’s handling of sexual abusers. Other company employees shut down an
artificial intelligence contract with the Pentagon that could have helped military drones become
more lethal.
Mr. Heinemeier Hansson cited the employee protests as evidence that millennial workers would
eventually revolt against the culture of overwork. “People aren’t going to stand for this,” he said,
using an expletive, “or buy the propaganda that eternal bliss lies at monitoring your own
bathroom breaks.” He was referring to an interview that the former chief executive of Yahoo,
Marissa Mayer, gave in 2016, in which she said that working 130 hours a week was possible “if
you’re strategic about when you sleep, when you shower, and how often you go to the
bathroom.”
Ultimately, workers must decide if they admire or reject this level of devotion. Ms. Mayer’s
comments were widely panned on social media when the interview ran, but since then, Quora
users have eagerly shared their own strategies for mimicking her schedule. Likewise, Mr. Musk’s
“pain level” tweets drew plenty of critical takes, but they also garnered just as many accolades
and requests for jobs.
The grim reality of 2019 is that begging a billionaire for employment via Twitter is not
considered embarrassing, but a perfectly plausible way to get ahead. On some level, you have to
respect the hustlers who see a dismal system and understand that success in it requires total,
shameless buy-in. If we’re doomed to toil away until we die, we may as well pretend to like it.
Even on Mondays.
Erin Griffith reports on technology start-ups and venture capital from the San Francisco bureau.
Before joining The Times she was a senior writer at WIRED and Fortune. @eringriffith
A version of this article appears in print on Jan. 26, 2019, on Page BU1 of the New York edition
with the headline: Drudge Report. Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
