– assignment question is attached in the files and called (screen shot 2019-04-29)- I attached a power point that have a sample already discussed in class.
screen_shot_2019_04_29_at_9.59.39_am.png
lesson_10_icm_sp19_1_.pptx
Unformatted Attachment Preview
LESSON 10 INTEGRATED
CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT
Lima Saft, PhD, PE, PMP
CIV E 580 Spring 2019
Vision
Transportation
System
Click tofor
edit
Master title style
Management
•• Click
to edit Integration
Master textand
styles
Multimodal
– Second level
Performance Based Management
• Traveler Information
• Arterial Management
• Freeway Management
• Transit Management
• Electronic Payment System
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
2
2
Incident
Management
Click to edit
Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
3
Using
All Available
Capacity
Click to– edit
Master title
style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
4
Strategic
Assessment
Click to edit
Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
5
What
theMaster
ICM Network
Assets:
Click toare
edit
title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
6
Fast
I-15 Integrated
ClickForward:
to edit Master
title style Corridor
Management Project
• Click to edit Master text styles
3
1
Main Laneslevel
– Second
2
Express Lanes
3
DAR
4
Transit
5
Rapid Transit Station
4
1
2
6
4
5
6
Arterial Network
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
7
Click
to edit Master title style
ICM Toolbox
• Click
ICM istoabout
edit Master text styles
management
– Second level of
a corridor
• Management implies
planning for, and
responding to, what is
happening across ALL
networks
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
8
Click to edit Master title style
Overall ICM Strategies
•• Click
to Active
editTraffic
Master
text styles
Implement
Management
(ATM):
• –
FirstSecond
in the nation
levelreal-time multimodal response and control (DSS
System)
• Proactively manage multiple modes through and along the corridor
• En-route traveler information (CMS Signs, 511 San Diego mobile app)
• Pre‐trip traveler information (511 San Diego mobile app, 511 phone
system)
• Signal coordination on local roadways with freeway ramp metering
• Transit rerouting
• Dynamic rerouting – November 2015
• Corridor ramp metering – November 2015
Monitor
Predict
Control
Propose
Evaluate
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
9
Integrated
Benefits*
Click to editCorridor
Master Management
title style
• Travel Time
• Click to edit Master text styles
– 477 hours saved per daily peak period
–– Second
level
250,000 to 350,000 person-hours saved per year
• Reliability of Travel Time
– Improves by 11.2 percent
• Fuel Consumption
– 325,000 gallons of fuel saved annually
• Emissions
– 3,057 tons of emissions saved annually
• ICM produces a 10-year benefit of $94 million
• *US DOT Intelligent Transportation Systems data
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
10
Click
to edit Master title style
ICM Corridor
•
•
•
•
•
•
Unique
in the U.S.
Click tofacility
edit Master
text styles
“Freeway
within a freeway”
– Second level
20 miles long
10 general purpose lanes
4 reconfigurable lanes
Multiple entry/exit points
and Direct Access Ramps
• Integrated with new BRT
service
• Smart Parking
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
11
Corridor
Overview
Click to edit
Master title style
• Corridor
Click to characteristics
edit Master text styles
–
activity
– Many
Second
level generators
– LOS F predominates in peak
hours – many bottlenecks
– Heavy CVO traffic
– Riverside County commuters
– 3 segments: South, Mid, North as
shown here
– High ITS investment
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
12
Click to edit Master
title style
Operational
Characteristics
••
•
•
>250,000
vehicles/day
Click to edit
Master text styles
5– choke
Secondpoints
level each, both northbound & southbound
Significant congestion in the North segment during AM
peak and in the Mid segment during PM peak
• Congestion aggravated by ML construction and CVO traffic
• I-15 Reversible Lanes have significantly reduced
congestion in the south of corridor
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
13
Click to edit Master
title style
Institutional
Environment
• Rich history of partnerships, coordination, and
• Click
to edit Master
text styles
cooperation
among stakeholders
Freeway
– –Second
level
• Implementation of FSP
• Roles & responsibilities for Managed Lanes (ML) Project
– Arterials
• Development of Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS)
– Transit
• Regional passes/fare integration – Compass Card
• Schedule coordination
– Cross-Agency
•
•
•
•
Corridor Directors
Cities and County Transportation Advisory Committee (CTAC)
San Diego Regional Traffic Engineers’ Council (SANTEC)
511 traveler information services
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
14
Problem
Definition:
Institutional
Click to edit
Master title
style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
•
•
•
•
•
•
Multiple Modes
Multiple Jurisdictions
Core Understanding Only
Lack of Operational Visibility
Limited Procedural Awareness
Desire to cooperate, but
lacked vehicle
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
15
Click to edit
style
Priority
ICM Master
Strategytitle
Areas
• Share/Distribute Information
• Click
to edit
Master
text styles
– Pre-trip
traveler
information
– Enroute traveler information
– Second level
• Junctions/Interfaces Improvement
– Transit signal priority
– Freeway ramp meters/arterial traffic signals coordination
– Bus rapid transit
–
• Accommodate/Promote Network Shifts
– Modify ramp metering rates
– Congestion pricing for managed lanes
• Capacity/Demand Management (Short-Term)
– Modify HOV restrictions
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
16
Institutional
Path: Vision
to Implementation
Click to edit Master
title style
MOUs
Management Framework
Technical Memorandum
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
Common Vision – Management/Operations – Day to Day Operations
Stage 1
Phase 2
Stage 3
Phase 3
Beyond
Concept
Development and
Draft Reqs. –
Partnership
Commitment
Advanced Modelling & Simulation –
Operational and Management
Guidance
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
Implementing Vision
Corridor Management and
Operations in Practice
17 17
Click to edit
Master
title
Technical
Path:
Vision
to style
Development
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
18
ClickSolution
to edit Master
title style
The
Proposed
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second
level /
Data Integration
Fusion Engine
Business Rules
Engine
Corridor
Visualization
Real-Time Network
Prediction
Response Plan
Evaluation Engine
Automation
Workflow Engine
Performance
Data Warehouse
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
19
Click
edit Master
title style
ICMtoSystem
Components
System Services
iNet
• Click to edit Master text styles
(GUI,
– Second level
Response
Plans)
PeMS
aPeMS
tPeMS
Learning/Feedback
Enhancements to serve as
the corridor performance
management element of DSS
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
(Real-Time
Simulation and
Predictive
Analysis)
Data Hub Servers
Aimsun
Online
Interfacing Systems (Context Diagram)
ICMS Data Stores
(includes Library of
a-priori plans)
RSDS/RAC
511
20
Click to
editProcess
Master title style
ICMS
Core
Inventory + Prediction
4
Event Response
Suite
•1 Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
3
Business
Rules
Engine
2
Corridor MOE 5
{0.00, -13.28, 11.14, 1.19, 7.81, 2.2}
6
Recommended
Response
Plan
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
21
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
22
Click to edit
Master
titleTool
style
Response
Plan
Analysis
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
23
Baseline
Establishment:
Click to edit
Master title style
Understanding Response Plans
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
Date
Event ID:
• Click to edit Master text styles
Response Plan ID:
Begin
31039
End
Duration
– Second level
2:34 PM
3:30 PM
55mins,51sec
Score:
SUMMARY
853963
6.6
@
3:04 PM
Severity
Dir
Post Mile
Roadway
Event Location
Description
Major
NB
23.9
I-15 N
Rancho Bernardo Rd.
Congestion on North I-15 near Rancho
Bernardo Rd. Consider alternate route.
<>
Traffic Signals
16
Ramp M eters
2
Response Plan Map
CM S
1
I-15 North at JSO Camino Del Norte
511 M essage:
Congestion on north I-15 near Rancho Bernardo Rd. Consider alternate routes
inlcuding Exit at Ted Williams to Pomerado North and re-enter at Pomerado on
ramp.
Notes:
Data along the response plan generated arterial route shows a clear increase in
vehicle flow. This increase in flow, however, shows no negative impact on the
speeds or travel times, as is demonstrated by INRIX data along Ted Williams
Pkwy and Pomerado Rd. Travel time remains relatively consistent to normal
day operations for that route. Reasons behind a lack of improvement in travel
time along the route could be attributed to weather conditions (rain and
thunderstorms) during that time frame. Heavy rainfal began approximately
around 2:30pm which is when the event was generated. Event did not trigger
until 3pm, however, once congestion had accumulated along the I-15 North.
24
Click to edit Master title style
What ICM Will Do
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
25
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
26
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
27
Alternate
Click to edit Master title style
Route Signs
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
28
Click
to edit
Master title
style
So What
is Happening
Now?
• SANDAG;
Caltrans;
of San Diego, Poway, and
Click to edit
Mastercities
text styles
Escondido;
– Second levelNCTD; and MTS are working together
• ICM system allows partners to address congestion
in real-time, holistically under ‘normal’ and
incident conditions
• Alternate route signs are being installed on
surface streets along the I-15 corridor to reroute
motorists in the event of major incidents
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
29
ICM to
Team
Development of
Click
editEfforts
MasterLead
titleTo
style
I-15 Director Level Management Team
• •Click
edit corridor
Master text
styles
Longtoterm
management
vision
– Second level
• Assess and analyze corridor management
strategies
• Make actionable recommendations
The team will carry out a multi-modal platform that places emphasis on
corridor performance monitoring and management to optimize overall corridor
operations in an on-going basis and identify near-term, cost-effective solutions to
get the most out of our transportation system. Efforts will serve as model for other
corridors.
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
30
I-15
ClickManagement
to edit MasterTeam’s
title style
Goals and Objectives
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
Optimize/Maintain
Trip Reliability
Enhance Corridor
Management
Operations
Minimize Person
Delay
Maximize Non-SOV
Mode Share
Maximize Person
Throughput
Maximize
Efficiency in the
Express Lanes
Maximize Transit
Service
Performance
Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) and Accurate Data Collection
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
31
Performance
Since ICM
(April 2014)
Click to edit Master
titleactivation
style
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
System
Click
to is
edit
triggered:
Master text
1-2 times
stylesa month
–
Second level
Automatic
adjustment of signals and ramp meters
Decrease in travel times: 3-9%
Increase in Travel Speed: 2-10%
Diversion to the Arterials (passive): 9-20%
Expect % Diversion to go up with Active Re-routing
Travel time reliability: ~ 90%
32
ICM
System
Continues
ClickHighlights:
to edit Master
titleOperations
style
••
•
•
Over
Plans text styles
Click20K
toResponses
edit Master
Over
2000Klevel
Events
– Second
Continued Work with I-15 ICM Team for ICM System Monitoring
(System Performance and System Enhancements) –
– Establishing System Procedures for Major Event
– Signal Subsystem Transition
– Ramp Metering 2070 Firmware
– DSS Modeling Upgrades
– Assessment of Corridor Score Algorithm
– On-going system maintenance
33
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
34
Click to Next?
edit Master title style
What’s
– On-going performance monitoring
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
– The implementation of the ICM concept is a key
– Using Lessons Learned from the I-15 ICM project for
other corridors
– In the Region: the update to San Diego Forward. It
includes the completion of the next ICM Concept of
Operations Reports three additional corridors
35
Click to edit
Master
title style
Lessons
Learned:
Institutional
• Click to edit Master text styles
Second
level
• –Follow
Foundational
Documents
• Consider Effort as a PATH with Time with your partners as the
•
•
•
•
most valuable resource: Allows for presence-validationunderstanding – perspective
Operational Respectfulness/Constraints
Individual and Group Discussions are Key
Apply Existing and Traditional Principles
We Don’t Know What We Don’t Know
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
36
Click to edit
Master
title style
Lessons
Learned:
Technical
ApplytoTechnical
Platform
Path
•• Click
edit Master
text“V”
styles
– Second level
• Conduct a Requirements Walkthrough: Keep
them honest!
• Explain Individually, Discuss as a Group:
Requirements must be traced back to the
original objectives, strategies and needs. Focus
the group on where those requirements come
from, and listen for where requirements are
needed to provide the balance in approach.
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
37
Lessons
Learned:
Technical
Click to edit
Master
title style
Data
• •Click
toRequirements
edit Master Extensive:
text stylesFormatting | Size | Level
Integration
– of
Second
level
• Require Performance: make certain your requirements
specify the Inputs | Functional Requirements | Outputs,
but also ensure that key Performance metrics are a
required.
• System Monitoring – Maintenance: Maintain project
objectives | System Performance | System
Enhancements etc.., relevant.
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
38
Click to edit Master title style
• Respect: At no time did we think the ICM solution
• Click
to edit
Master understood
text styles traffic or traffic
we were
delivering
–control
Second systems
level
better than the local operator. Our
operators manage the local peak conditions
extremely well.
• Agility: At the outset, we asked “if [condition-A]
happens, how quickly can you or your system
account for an abnormal increase in demand by
changing the way it operates?”
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
39
Lessons
Learned:
Technical
Click to edit
Master
title style
Awareness:
On a text
regular
occurrence, we asked
• •Click
to edit Master
styles
– “Why
Seconddoes
level it work that way, and if it’s impacting
another mode or jurisdiction, what can you do?”
• Constraints: Our Operators plan for the peak, and
communicate how they intend to handle that
reoccurring local peak through formal
documentation (Circulation Plan) submitted to
Council. Adhere to these guidelines, and support
your Operator.
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
40
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
41
Click
to editCorridor
Master Management
title style
Integrated
“MTS bus dispatchers can
“Caltransto
is dedicated
to the ICM text styles
• Click
edit Master
project because it is critical to
–enhancing
Second
thelevel
livability of I-15
commuters. The project’s success is
due to collaborative, strategic
partnerships of local, regional, and
state agencies working in concert
towards the common goal of providing
network efficiency and reliability.”
Cory Binns, PE
Chief Deputy District Director
Caltrans District 11
effectively manage all local and
commuter services in the I-15
corridor by using the ICM interface.
Because the interface is
comprehensive and includes
current and predicted traffic,
cameras, incidents, and other
corridor information in real-time,
we can manage our routing
dynamically to get our passengers
to their destinations in the quickest
and most efficient way possible.”
Devin Braun
Manager of Transportation
Communication & Technology
MTS
Copyright (2015) California Department of Transportation. All Rights Preserved
42
Homework
Click to edit#9
Master title style
• Write
a one-page
essay
onstyles
the feasibility of
Click to
edit Master
text
implementing
– Second level ICM on a specific transportation
corridor in San Diego County (except for I-15 already
discussed here). Include the list of stakeholders, what
are the components that need to exist and/or be
deployed (geographical, technical, operational), and
why do you think it should be a top priority.
• Individual work, plagiarism (from on-line sources or
your classmates) will result in 0 credit at a minimum
• Submit via Turnitin in Word Format – Due May 1.
43
…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
